 |
|
Live and Let Die
You know, this is really hard for me since Paul McCartney's Original and Guns n' Roses cover sound very similar to each other, except the Guns n' Roses version as a bit more edge to it. I Guess I like them both, but if I had to choose one I would say I would like Paul McCartney's original just a teeny bit more than the cover version by Guns n'Roses.
- Bryan Tremblay, Santa Barbara, United States, 18.11.2005
Guns and Roses
1991 |
vs. |
Paul McCartney and Wings
1973 |
| Click on the cover for listening |
|
Click on the cover for listening |
Comments about Live and Let Die:
Paul McCartney is the best singer ever!
GNR SUCKS DICKIE
- Katherine, Fort Worth, United States, 04.09.2010 |
Guns n' Roses vocals just don't work for this song
- Paul, Columbus, United States, 18.07.2010 |
I've listened both in cd and live, and Paul is always the best, Macca really rocks!!! also GNR copied all his show live when they played the song with fireworks etc
- M, Madrid, Spain, 18.12.2009 |
The original is the best! Guns&Roses sucks! Come on!
- NellieW, Dallas, United States, 18.12.2009 |
Paul's version is the best.
- Rocio, Monterrey, Mexico, 18.12.2009 |
el original the best!!
- orlando, buenos aires, Argentina, 17.12.2009 |
The original, of course!!!
- Claire, Orlando, United States, 16.12.2009 |
GNR was, and still is, a disgrace to music.
- Mike, Chicago, United States, 01.12.2009 |
yet again, GNR have outshined the original.
- Andrew Castillo, Houston, Texas, United States, 21.04.2009 |
Sorry to just had to laugh at the below comment. ( considering it came from st louis) get real! st louis DOES suck!
- Lauren, ...., Other, 12.02.2009 |
|
