Cover vs. Original

Helter Skelter


I like the Crue version better.

- John Barron, , Groß Britannien, 18.12.2005


Mötley Crüe
1983

vs.

The Beatles
1968

CD-Cover: Mötley Crüe - Shout at the Devil 45 % 55 % CD-Cover: The Beatles - The White Album
Results of the voting: Cover versus Original
Click on the cover for listening Click on the cover for listening
Mötley Crüe 1258 Votes The Beatles

Comments about Helter Skelter:

1 2
Paul Walrus, FUCK you. YOU'RE EVEN FROM ENGLAND! Motley Crue is decent, but blatanly voting AGAINST the beatles? were you dropped as a child? Maybe too much sucking dick for crack has melted your sensory organs. You have no business being a human being if you cannot accept the fact that The Beatles are perfection. If you think otherwise you should probably go take a bath with your toaster, who agrees with you. For a better effect, place you genitalia inside the toaster before submerging yourself into the water. Paul Walrus, YOU are the reason the world is as fucked as a 30 cent whore.
- Patrick M., St. Louis, United States, 06.02.2008
Ringo could not drum sorry to say. But yes The Beatles were a great band whereas Crue was just a fun band
- Jim, Rome, United States, 18.01.2008
That this vote is so close just goes to show how stupid people can be. There is, of course, no contest here. And anybody who thinks there is isn't qualified to speak on the subject.
- Ghostface Killa, New York, United States, 13.07.2007
An insiped, substandard, cover of a great song. The Original is great and the Banshees & U2 both showed it can done well but this is just a bore.
- John, London, England, 20.05.2007
I hear Charles Manson stole it from the Beatles, but U2 definitely stole it back.
- Brian, Philladelphia, United States, 28.02.2007
The Beatles ROCKED!!! listen to Ringo's drumming!!! Too bad we can't hear the 27 min version!!!
- James, Sunrise,Fl, United States, 29.08.2006
This is pretty much the first "hard rock" song so A without the crue wouldn't be around B you can't beat the Beatles
- Sean, Everywhere, United States, 08.08.2006
Any version is better than the Beatles.
- Paul Walrus, Birmingham, England, 28.03.2006
U2 also made a cover of this song in their disc Rattle and Hum, and it's better than Mötley Crue's cover (but not better than the original by the Beatles, that's just imposible)
- Mike, Valencia, Spain, 13.01.2006
Sorry, due to a database error the name of the author was lost. I would be grateful if you can send me the name again (email: michael.mueller2000@freenet.de) or here as a comment. Thanks.
- Michael, Hamburg, Germany, 18.12.2005
1 2
««« Top